Trump Team Re-Ups Prosecutor Jab on Eve of Surrender_我的网站
A | Sophie 编译 在哈马斯去年10月袭击以色列后，新西兰现在把哈马斯的政治机构列为恐怖主义实体。
B |
On the night of the first GOP presidential debate, as Donald Trump’s political rivals discussed immigration, abortion, China and education, the absent former president’s campaign shared a slew of policy videos. At first blush, the move might seem to be an unremarkable attempt to stay in the discussion. But among the agenda items aimed at ending the “nightmare” of homelessness, protecting students from liberal ideology “infecting educational institutions” and a plan to “restore law and order” was a proposal with a sharper edge – one for eliminating prosecutions as we know them.
The choice was curious for a candidate who is also a defendant facing criminal processing on Thursday – one who has been warned as a condition of release not to do anything that could be construed asintimidating witnesses, co-conspirators or basically anyone in the legal system. And it highlights the narrow space between Trump’s political messaging and threats of retribution he has been prohibited from delivering.
In the video, dubbed “Firing the Radical Marxist Prosecutors Destroying America,” Trump pledges to “restore the scales of justice in America” and end the “weaponization” of the justice system at the hand of “Marxist local district attorneys,” with a plan to overhaul the Justice Department and order investigations into district attorneys, while appointing 100 U.S. attorneys who will be the “polar opposite” of those he says are destroying the rule of law.
“As we completely overhaul the federal Department of Justice and FBI, we will also launch sweeping civil rights investigations into Marxist local District Attorneys,” Trump said, claiming the prosecutors had engaged in illegal selective enforcement.
The video – part of Trump’s broader Agenda 47, a loose collection of priorities if he were to win the White House and become the 47th president that Trump also shared on social media Wednesday night – was initially released on April 13. That was the day he appeared for a deposition in New York in a case brought by Attorney General Letitia James, who has for years been among the foremost targets of Trump’s ire. But it also mirrors language Trump has used to disparage Atlanta District Attorney Fani Willis, who brought the charges in an election interference case to which Trump is expected to surrender on Thursday.
The former president, who insists he has done nothing wrong, is set to be booked on the charges after his legal team agreed to his release conditions earlier this week. Among the conditions, which are far more voluminous than those agreed to by the other defendants, Trump must not intimidate co-defendants, witnesses, unindicted co-conspirators, any victim, the community or property within the community, or “otherwise obstruct the administration of justice.” The order stipulates that such intimidation – “no direct or indirect threat of any nature” – includes posts on social media or reposts of posts made by others on social media.
The social media restriction is notable given Trump’s penchant for plentiful posts about those who he says have wronged him. Since the agreement, signed on Monday, Trump’s rhetoric about the case has appeared to dwindle. Even so, he shared a video from Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones on Wednesday that claimed Willis had “funneled millions of taxpayer dollars into her self-serving pursuits,” while Atlanta’s crime “goes unchecked.” And on Monday, hours after the agreement, Trump balked at his upcoming arrest by the “radical left district attorney.”
The issue has arisen in other cases the former president faces as well, including in the Jan. 6 case where prosecutors sought a protective order after Trump appeared to make comments related to the case in a post on social media, in what they argued was part of a pattern of the former president posting about ongoing cases – and sometimes going after judges and attorneys in the process.
Meanwhile, Trump’s surrogates have maintained pressure on Willis, as they have in the other cases he faces, like on Thursday when the House Judiciary Committee opened an investigation into the district attorney, claiming that her pursuit of the charges against Trump is politically motivated, and requesting documents related to the case.
It’s likely part of a strategy Trump will employ going forward, as his speech comes under the microscope, while he tests a fine legal line in the march toward four criminal trials amid a presidential campaign.
。
总理Christopher Luxon和外交部长Winston Peters今天发布声明，确认哈马斯的政治机构已与其军事机构一起，被列为恐怖主义实体。
Advertise with us
这个巴勒斯坦组织的军事机构在2010年被列为恐怖主义实体。
C | 在10月7日的袭击之后，前总理Chris Hipkins就是否对哈马斯的政治机构采取同样的行动征求意见。这次袭击导致以色列发动血腥的军事进攻，试图将哈马斯赶出加沙。
“……10月7日发生的事情表明，我们无法再区分哈马斯的军事机构和政治机构。该组织作为一个整体对这些可怕的恐怖袭击负有责任。”Peters说，同时他继续呼吁该地区实现和平。
D |
这一指定将冻结该实体在新西兰持有的任何资产，并将与其进行财产或金融交易定为刑事犯罪。
Luxon澄清说，这是针对哈马斯的行动，而不是更广泛意义上的巴勒斯坦人民。
“这一指定针对的是哈马斯，而不是向巴勒斯坦平民提供的私人人道主义援助。”
“同样，这一指定并不妨碍新西兰向加沙平民提供人道主义和未来的发展援助，也不会阻止我们向冲突地区的新西兰公民或永久居民提供领事支持。”
政府还宣布对在巴勒斯坦领土建立以色列定居点的人实施旅行禁令，意味着他们将无法前来新西兰。
E |
Luxon表示：“新西兰对近几个月以色列定居者对巴勒斯坦人口施加的极端暴力显著增加严重关切。
F | 在已经是一场重大危机的情况下，这尤其破坏了稳定性。”
Peters认为，这些定居点以及定居者实施的暴力行为破坏了实现两国解决方案的前景。
与此同时，以色列和哈马斯淡化了加沙停火谈判即将取得突破的可能性。
在哈马斯10月7日袭击以色列南部之后，以色列在加沙的空中、海上和地面行动已造成数万人死亡，城市被大面积摧毁，这片遭受重创的土地上80%的人口流离失所。
相关阅读：
新西兰将两大组织指定为恐怖主义实体
总理列名枪击案凶手为“恐怖分子实体”，其资产已被冻结
注：本文为编译/原创，欢迎转发分享；但严禁复制等未经授权的非法使用。
G | 违反上述声明者，本网将追究其相关法律责任。使用授权请联系[email protected]。
chineseherald.co.nz All Rights Reserved 版权所有
(责编：Sophie)
相关内容
“疯狂三月”来袭，AT考虑实施每周票价上限，不超过……
不舍Newshub关闭，AM Show知名主持人泪洒直播间
枪支法又要修订，联合政府打算怎么改？
悲伤的一天！Newshub宣布关闭，政界人士纷纷做出回应
1月份新西兰35人死于交通事故，这一行为成罪魁祸首！
新西兰主流新闻网站将关闭，员工自己都不知道这新闻
新西兰人气最高前总理宣布退休，下一站是夏威夷
奥克兰高档电动自行车连环窃案告破，警方还搜出200发子弹。
Current article:http://mqvxi0z.zhenzongtingrangunhongqiusao.shop/list_wx0ts/z3gnd2i.html
